4.5 Article

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced pancreatic cancer: A real world study in Chinese cohort

Journal

HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2143154

Keywords

Advanced pancreatic cancer; immune checkpoint inhibitors; real-world study; combination therapy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in Chinese patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). The results show that combined radiotherapy leads to longer overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as higher objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Patients who received a combination of chemotherapy also had longer OS and PFS compared to those combined with targeted therapy. ICIs as a first-line treatment may result in better survival outcomes. Patients with a high tumor mutational burden (TMB) had longer OS, while adverse events (AEs) were considered tolerable. The combination therapy of ICIs, especially with chemotherapy and radiotherapy, proved to be safe and effective for treating APC.
Previous clinical studies had not shown expected results in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) with single-agent checkpoint inhibitors. Until the present day, little is known about their performance in real-world settings. So, in this study, we investigate the ICIs' efficacy and safety in Chinese APC patients. Patients with APC who received ICIs between November 2018 to June 2021 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The efficacy end points included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs). This study included 104 patients and the median OS (mOS) and median PFS (mPFS) were 9.1 and 5.4 months, respectively. In the subgroup analyses, the mOS was longer for patients receiving combined radiotherapy than for those that didn't (13.8 vs 7.0 months, p < .001), whereas the mPFS was also longer, and the ORR and DCR were higher. Specifically, the mOS was longer for patients who had received a combination of chemotherapy than for those combined with targeted therapy (11.6 vs 5.6 months, p = .002), with the mPFS being also longer. ICIs as a first-line treatment could resulted to better survival. The mOS was longer for patients with a high TMB compared to those with low (19.3 vs 7.2 months, p = .004), whereas AEs were considered to be tolerable. The combination therapy of ICIs was proved to be safe and effective for treating APC, especially the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, which would benefit from additional prospective studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available