4.5 Article

Integrating multi-criteria analysis and spherical cellular automata approach for modelling global urban land-use change

Journal

GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10106049.2022.2152498

Keywords

Global land use change modelling; geographic automata systems; spherical cellular automata; multicriteria evaluation; geographic information systems

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Grant
  2. [RGPIN-2017-03939]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing geosimulation land-use change models are mainly designed for local or regional spatial scales, but they lack considerations for spatial distortions and land suitability analysis at the global level. This study integrates multi-criteria evaluation with spherical cellular automata to develop a novel modeling approach for simulating global urban land-use change.
Existing geosimulation land-use change models are predominantly designed to operate at local or regional spatial scales. When these models are applied on data at the global level, they do not consider the effects of spatial distortions caused by the curvature of the Earth's surface and often lack some refinements related to land suitability analysis. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to integrate multi-criteria evaluation with spherical cellular automata, to develop a novel modelling approach for simulating global urban land-use change. The world region is clustered into sub-regions to improve the suitability analysis. The obtained results reveal differences in urban growth rate and the size of the extent across the four clusters. The 64% of the total global urbanization are occurring in urban region clusters characterized by high gross domestic product and population density, while urban regions in isolated locations have the lowest urban growth rate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available