4.4 Review

Bidirectional association between NAFLD and gallstone disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages 283-293

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2023.2175671

Keywords

NAFLD; gallstone disease; meta-analysis; incidence; bidirectional association

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis found a positive concurrent and bidirectional relationship between NAFLD and GD, with a higher incidence in females.
BackgroundGrowing evidence indicates an association between NAFLD and gallstone disease (GD), while some does not support this. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the bidirectional association between NAFLD and GD.Research design and methodsFive electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2022. The association was analyzed based on the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) with Reviewer Manager 5.3.ResultsTen studies involving 284,512 participants met the criteria for GD predicting the onset of NAFLD. GD patients had a higher incidence of NAFLD (OR:1.48, CI:1.32-1.65, p < 0.00001), especially the incidence of moderate-to-severe NAFLD (OR:1.63; CI:1.40-1.79), with females at a higher risk (OR: 1.84; CI: 1.48-2.29). The inverse association was explored in eight studies involving 326,922 participants. The GD incidence in NAFLD patients was higher (OR:1.71, CI:1.63-1.79, p < 0.00001) and may increase due to female sex (OR: 4.18; CI: 1.21-14.37) and high BMI (OR: 1.80; CI: 1.36-2.56), compared with the non-NAFLD group. Besides, this bidirectional association was also confirmed in the Chinese population.ConclusionsThe findings supported positive concurrent and bidirectional relationships between NAFLD and GD. Therefore, clinicians may alert the possibility of NAFLD in patients with GD and vice versa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available