4.2 Article

Subjective Visual Vertical and Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Meniere's disease

Journal

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Volume 89, Issue 3, Pages 485-493

Publisher

ASSOC BRASILEIRA OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA & CIRURGIA CERVICOFACIAL
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.11.005

Keywords

Labyrinth diseases; Meniere's disease; Saccule and utricle; Vestibular function tests; Vestibular evoked; myogenic potentials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate otolith function in patients with unilateral definite Meniere's disease during the inter-crisis period by comparing the findings of the Subjective Visual Vertical, the cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential, and the ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential tests. The results showed no significant difference among these tests, indicating concordance.
Objective: To evaluate otolith function by comparing the findings of the Subjective Visual Vertical, the cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential and the ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential tests in patients in the inter-crisis period of unilateral definite Meniere's disease. Methods: The sample consisted of an experimental group (n = 22; 10 men and 12 women, mean age 47.32 +/- 12.82 years) with definite unilateral Meniere's disease and a control group (n = 14; 5 men and 9 women, with a mean age of 41.64 +/- 13.45 years). They all underwent vestibular evaluation by means of Subjective Visual Vertical with the bucket method and, cervical and ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential tests. The data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis. Results: The results of the comparison of the Subjective Visual Vertical, the cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential, the ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential and, the association Potential showed no significant difference, indicating concordance among the tests.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available