4.6 Review

Measuring emotional well-being through subjective report: a scoping review of reviews

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062120

Keywords

PUBLIC HEALTH; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PRIMARY CARE

Funding

  1. National Center For Complementary and Integrative Health of the National Institutes of Health [U24AT011281, U24AT011289, U24AT011310]
  2. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Award [K23AT010879]
  3. Hope for Depression Research Foundation Defeating Depression Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review explored the current landscape of measures of emotional well-being (EWB) and found that the literature in this field is disjointed and diffuse, highlighting the need for conceptual integration and harmonisation of measures.
ObjectiveThis scoping review of reviews aims to describe the current landscape of measures of emotional well-being (EWB). MethodsFollowing established practices for scoping reviews, we searched the PsycInfo, ERIC, Scopus and PubMed databases in June and July 2021 for reviews of measures of EWB that described their review methods and psychometric properties of included measures. From each eligible article, two coders independently extracted the authors' (1) definition of EWB, (2) purpose for the review, (3) methods (eg, search terms, inclusion and exclusion criteria), (4) identified measures (including any noted adaptations) and (5) the scope of psychometric information presented. Descriptive and content analyses were used to examine data. ResultsForty-nine reviews were included in this scoping review. Reviews included anywhere between 1 and 34 measures of EWB and 135 unique EWB measures were captured across all reviews. We found that there was no consistent definition of EWB, identified measures varied widely and reviews were published in a range of disciplines. Psychometric evidence varied as did authors' purposes for conducting the reviews. ConclusionsOverall, these reviews suggest that literature on EWB measurement is disjointed and diffuse. Conceptual integration and harmonisation of measures is needed to advance knowledge of EWB and its measurement. Trial registration numbers10.17605/OSF.IO/BQDS7 and 10.17605/OSF.IO/WV8PF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available