4.6 Review

Scoping review protocol to map studies on self-healing practices for suicide loss survivors

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064993

Keywords

Suicide & self-harm; PUBLIC HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH

Funding

  1. Pusat Layanan Pembiayaan Pendidikan (Puslapdik) [202101120026]
  2. Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP)
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council Early Career Fellowship [1157796]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This scoping review aims to examine the extent of self-healing research in suicide-related grief, including the representation of different subpopulations and geographical areas, the methodologies used, and the outcomes associated with self-healing practices. The research gap in this area will be highlighted to inform future study direction.
IntroductionSuicide loss survivors often find it challenging to access professional help due to social stigma despite being at a higher risk of developing suicidal behaviour and mental health problems. Most available grief interventions are professional-led and heavily rely on help-seeking behaviour. Self-healing is a growing alternative intervention that is still relatively under-researched for suicide-bereaved individuals. This scoping review aims to determine the extent to which self-healing research has been undertaken, how well all subpopulations and geographical areas are represented, the methodologies used and outcomes associated with self-healing practices in suicide-related grief. The research gap in this area will be highlighted to inform future study direction. Method and analysisThe proposed review will be guided by the methodological framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley in 2015. Articles will be retrieved from CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Peer-reviewed publications that provide data on self-healing practices within the context of suicide loss survivors will be included. The research team will screen the retrieved articles through a two-step screening process: (1) Title and abstract screening and (2) full-text screening. The reporting of the scoping review will be done following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews guideline. Ethics and disseminationThis study does not require ethical approval because it will synthesise information from available publications. Results of this scoping review will be submitted for publication to a peer-reviewed journal and potentially be presented at relevant conferences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available