4.4 Article

Numerical study of magnetic island coalescence using magnetohydrodynamics with adaptively embedded particle-in-cell model

Journal

AIP ADVANCES
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0122087

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Collisionless magnetic reconnection usually requires expensive kinetic treatment. In this study, we use an innovative MHD-AEPIC model to investigate the interaction of two magnetic flux ropes. By comparing the simulation results among three cases, we find that good agreement can be achieved by incorporating large adaptive PIC regions within the MHD domain, indicating the importance of the coupling between macro-scale MHD and micro-scale kinetic physics in the highly kinetic magnetic island coalescence problem.
Collisionless magnetic reconnection typically requires kinetic treatment that is, in general, computationally expensive compared to fluid-based models. In this study, we use the magnetohydrodynamics with an adaptively embedded particle-in-cell (MHD-AEPIC) model to study the interaction of two magnetic flux ropes. This innovative model embeds one or more adaptive PIC regions into a global MHD simulation domain such that the kinetic treatment is only applied in regions where the kinetic physics is prominent. We compare the simulation results among three cases: (1) MHD with adaptively embedded PIC regions, (2) MHD with statically (or fixed) embedded PIC regions, and (3) a full PIC simulation. The comparison yields good agreement when analyzing their reconnection rates and magnetic island separations as well as the ion pressure tensor elements and ion agyrotropy. In order to reach good agreement among the three cases, large adaptive PIC regions are needed within the MHD domain, which indicates that the magnetic island coalescence problem is highly kinetic in nature, where the coupling between the macro-scale MHD and micro-scale kinetic physics is important.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available