4.5 Review

Comparison of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy with Other Surgical Technics: A Systemic Review of Indications and Outcomes of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy from the Current Literature

Journal

WORLD NEUROSURGERY
Volume 168, Issue -, Pages 349-358

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.153

Keywords

Biportal; Endoscopic spine surgery; Lumbar disc herniation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the outcomes and complications of UBE discectomy for lumbar disc herniation. The results showed relatively good clinical outcomes and a low incidence of complications associated with UBE discectomy.
OBJECTIVE: Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) spine surgery for spinal diseases has been increasing in popu-larity because of its favorable outcomes. The goal of this systemic review is to analyze the status of outcomes and complications in lumbar disc herniation during UBE discectomy. -METHODS: A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and OVID databases published -ntil June 30, 2021, was performed. The outcomes of in-terest were indications, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry Disability Index. -RESULTS: Seven studies were included in our research. UBE surgery for lumbar stenosis was excluded. A total of 230 patients with lumbar disc herniation were enrolled in the 7 selected studies. The mean operative time was 74.4 minutes, and the mean length of hospital stay was 4.5 days. Mean incidence of complications reported in the 7 articles was 6.2%. UBE showed shorter hospital stays than did microdiscectomy, no significant differences of Oswestry Disability Index or visual analog scale scores, and good recovery rate among other discectomy techniques (micro-discectomy, full endoscopic transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, and interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy) at 1 month follow-up. -CONCLUSIONS: Even with the small number of studies and reports analyzed, biases were the main limitation of this analysis; overall, the clinical outcomes and compli-cation rates associated with UBE discectomy were rela-tively good. It is clear that UBE discectomy is a good treatment choice for lumbar disc herniation, but to prevent u nique UBE surgery complications, a clear understanding of the surgical procedures and careful efforts to overcome the learning curve are necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available