4.7 Article

Influence of online opinions and interactions on the Covid-19 vaccination in Chile

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23738-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy [ICN09_016/ICN 2021_045]
  2. FONDECYT [1190830]
  3. CHuepe Labs Inc.
  4. SoL-UC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes 6 months of Twitter conversations related to the Chilean Covid-19 vaccination process in order to understand the online forces that support or oppose it. Through AI, the study classifies accounts into four categories based on the language used, distinguishing pro- and anti-vaccine activists from moderates. The research finds that all categories have relatively constant opinions, but the number of tweeting accounts increases during controversial periods. It also reveals that accounts disfavoring vaccination tend to appear in the periphery of the interaction network and are more active in addressing those favoring vaccination, indicating a potential communication problem.
We analyze 6 months of Twitter conversations related to the Chilean Covid-19 vaccination process, in order to understand the online forces that argue for or against it and suggest effective digital communication strategies. Using AI, we classify accounts into four categories that emerge from the data as a result of the type of language used. This classification naturally distinguishes pro- and anti-vaccine activists from moderates that promote or inhibit vaccination in discussions, which also play a key role that should be addressed by public policies. We find that all categories display relatively constant opinions, but that the number of tweeting accounts grows in each category during controversial periods. We also find that accounts disfavoring vaccination tend to appear in the periphery of the interaction network, which is consistent with Chile's high immunization levels. However, these are more active in addressing those favoring vaccination than vice-versa, revealing a potential communication problem even in a society where the antivaccine movement has no central role. Our results highlight the importance of social network analysis to understand public discussions and suggest online interventions that can help achieve successful immunization campaigns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available