4.7 Article

Glutathione peroxidase 4 expression predicts poor overall survival in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25019-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Joint Research Program [109DN17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the protein expression of GPX4 in resected NSCLC and found a correlation between GPX4 expression and poor survival outcomes.
This study aimed to evaluate the protein expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The clinical relevance and prognostic significance of GPX4 expression were analyzed. We reviewed patients with resected NSCLCs at Taipei Veterans General Hospital between September 2002 and January 2018. Available paraffin-embedded specimens were retrieved for immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining to detect GPX4 expression. The cutoff value for defining GPX4 positivity was determined according to the percentage of tumor stained in the microscopic field. The correlation between immune expression, clinicopathologic data, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. A total of 265 NSCLC specimens were retrieved for IHC staining. GPX4 expression positive was in 192 (72.5%) according to a cutoff value of 5%. GPX4 was a significant prognostic factor for OS and DFS on multivariate analysis at both 5% and 25% cutoff values. GPX4 expression was associated with poor OS and DFS, especially in lung adenocarcinoma (p = 0.008, and 0.027, respectively). In conclusions, IHC analysis revealed that GPX4 expression was associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma. Further research is needed to understand the role of GPX4 in tumorigenesis and the underlying mechanism responsible for survival outcomes in patients with resected lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available