4.7 Article

Ecological factors are likely drivers of eye shape and colour pattern variations across anthropoid primates

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20900-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) Singapore, under its CRP funding programme [NRF-CRP 20-2017-0001]
  2. Singapore International Graduate Award (SINGA)
  3. European Union [802719]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [802719] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study quantifies the differences in eye shape and coloration among 77 primate species, finding that species with heavier body weight and terrestrial locomotion have elongated eye outlines, species living closer to the equator have more pigmented conjunctivae, and species living further away from the equator have bluer irises.
External eye appearance across primate species is diverse in shape and colouration, yet we still lack an explanation for the drivers of such diversity. Here we quantify substantial interspecific variation in eye shape and colouration across 77 primate species representing all extant genera of anthropoid primates. We reassess a series of hypotheses aiming to explain ocular variation in horizontal elongation and in colouration across species. Heavier body weight and terrestrial locomotion are associated with elongated eye outlines. Species living closer to the equator present more pigmented conjunctivae, suggesting photoprotective functions. Irises become bluer in species living further away from the equator, adding to existing literature supporting a circadian clock function for bluer irises. These results shift the current focus from communicative, to ecological factors in driving variation in external eye appearance in anthropoid primates. They also highlight the possibility that similar ecological factors contributed to selection for blue eyes in ancestral human populations living in northern latitudes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available