4.7 Article

Identification of a cantilever beam's spatially uncertain stiffness

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27755-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study non-destructively identifies non-homogeneous stiffness from noisy measurements of a structural response. The finite element method is used for the discretization of cantilever beam problems, and Karhunen-Loeve expansions represent the stiffness random fields. Bayesian inference is used to solve the inverse problems and introduce a novel resonance frequency method. The results show that static analysis outperforms modal analysis in terms of mean performance, and the quality of the static analysis solution depends on the beam position while the confidence interval remains constant for modal analysis. The static loading procedure yields lower errors than the dynamic procedure for the chosen configuration with ideal boundary conditions.
This study identifies non-homogeneous stiffnesses in a non-destructive manner from simulated noisy measurements of a structural response. The finite element method serves as a discretization for the respective cantilever beam example problems: static loading and modal analysis. Karhunen-Loeve expansions represent the stiffness random fields. We solve the inverse problems using Bayesian inference on the Karhunen-Loeve coefficients, hereby introducing a novel resonance frequency method. The flexible descriptions of both the structural stiffness uncertainty and the measurement noise characteristics allow for straightforward adoption to measurement setups and a range of non-homogeneous materials. Evaluating the inversion performance for varying stiffness covariance functions shows that the static analysis procedure outperforms the modal analysis procedure in a mean sense. However, the solution quality depends on the position within the beam for the static analysis approach, while the confidence interval height remains constant along the beam for the modal analysis. An investigation of the effect of the signal-to-noise ratio reveals that the static loading procedure yields lower errors than the dynamic procedure for the chosen configuration with ideal boundary conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available