Efficacy of bone stimulators in large-animal models and humans may be limited by weak electric fields reaching fracture

Noninvasive electronic bone growth stimulators (EBGSs) have been in clinical use for decades. However, systematic reviews show inconsistent and limited clinical efficacy. Further, noninvasive EBGS studies in small animals, where the stimulation electrode is closer to the fracture site, have shown promising efficacy, which has not translated to large animals or humans. We propose that this is due to the weaker electric fields reaching the fracture site when scaling from small animals to large animals and humans. To address this gap, we measured the electric field strength reaching the bone during noninvasive EBGS therapy in human and sheep cadaver legs and in finite element method (FEM) models of human and sheep legs. During application of 1100 V/m with an external EBGS, only 21 V/m reached the fracture site in humans. Substantially weaker electric fields reached the fracture site during the later stages of healing and at increased bone depths. To augment the electric field strength reaching the fracture site during noninvasive EBGS therapy, we introduced the Injectrode, an injectable electrode that spans the distance between the bone and subcutaneous tissue. Our study lays the groundwork to improve the efficacy of noninvasive EBGSs by increasing the electric field strength reaching the fracture site.

Automated summary

Noninvasive electronic bone growth stimulators (EBGSs) have been used clinically for decades, but systematic reviews show inconsistent and limited efficacy. Studies in small animals suggest promising efficacy when the stimulation electrode is closer to the fracture site, but this has not been replicated in large animals or humans. The weaker electric fields reaching the fracture site when scaling from small animals to large animals and humans may explain this disparity.