4.7 Article

Living on the sea-coast: ranging and habitat distribution of Asiatic lions

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23761-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Gujarat Government's Gujarat State Lion Conservation Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Asiatic lions living in the coastal habitats have a larger home range compared to lions in the protected area, and they extensively use forest habitat patches and habitats around water sources. This highlights the importance of corridors connecting to the protected area and coastal forest patches for lion conservation and management.
Endangered Asiatic lions (Panthera leo persica) are renowned for their resilience and as a flagship of successful conservation and management. Lions dispersing out of the Gir forest have established themselves in the coastal habitats for about 25 years. We propose that the home range and spatial distribution of lions inhabiting the coastal habitats would be distinct from the forested habitats of the protected area. Each individual was monitored for an average of 367.2 +/- 99.05 days from 2019 to 2021. The mean core area was 33.8 km(2) (50% FK, SE 8.7 km(2)) and the overall average range was 171.8 km(2) (90% FK, SE 40.5 km(2)). The home ranges were significantly larger for lions residing in the coastal area compared to lions in the protected area. The lion distribution model was built on MaxEnt, and inputs included location fixes of lions and variables, including 18 land use categories and Euclidean distance to linear infrastructures and human settlements. Lions were shown to use forest habitat patches extensively, followed by available habitats around water sources and wasteland. The study highlights the importance of corridors connecting to the Gir protected area and the importance of coastal forest patches for lion conservation and management.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available