Journal
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -Publisher
NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24283-6
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM)
- Saudi Aramco [CIPR2354]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study found that the addition of liquid activated carbon or iron-modified liquid activated carbon to subsurface materials did not significantly improve the removal efficiency of MTBE, but showed a slight improvement in the adsorption efficiency of benzene and toluene.
Fuel components such as benzene, toluene, and methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) are frequently detected pollutants in groundwater resources. Ex-situ remediation technologies by activated carbon have been used for treatment for many years. However, due to high cost of these technology, more attention has been given to the in-situ remediation methods of contaminated groundwaters using liquid carbon adsorbents. Literature search showed limited studies on using adsorbents in liquid form for the removal of such contaminants. Therefore, this lab-scale study investigates the capacity of using raw biochar-based liquid activated carbon and iron-modified biochar-based liquid activated carbon to remove these pollutants. The adsorption efficiency of the synthesized liquid activated carbon and iron-modified liquid activated carbon mixed with sand, limestone, and 1:1 mixture of sand/limestone, was tested using batch suspension experiments. Adsorption by granular activated carbon was also investigated for comparison with liquid activated carbon. Results of the study revealed that mixing of liquid activated carbon or LAC-Fe on subsurface materials had not improved the removal efficiency of MTBE. At the same time, it showed a slight improvement in the adsorption efficiency of benzene and toluene. In all cases, the removal by GAC was higher with around 80% and 90% for MTBE and BT, respectively. Results also showed that benzene and toluene were better removed by liquid activated carbon and iron-modified liquid activated carbon (similar to 40%) than MTBE (similar to 20%). It is also found that water chemistry (i.e., salinity and pH) had insignificant effects on the removal efficiency of pollutants under the study conditions. It can be concluded that more research is needed to improve the capacity of biochar-based liquid-activated carbon in removing MTBE, benzene and toluene compounds that will lead to improve the utilization of liquid activated carbon for the in-situ remediation of contaminated groundwaters.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available