4.7 Article

Evaluation of drug prescribing patterns and therapeutic drug monitoring practice using electronic medical records

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25794-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. BK21-plus education program
  2. National Foundation of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed prescription patterns and TDM practices using electronic medical records at SNUH and SNUBH, finding different trends for various drugs and a higher usage of serum level tests or TDM in antibiotics compared to antiepileptics. With the emergence of new drugs, old drugs are being replaced.
Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed for drugs with narrow therapeutic indices. At Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH), TDM services are provided for various drugs such as antibiotics and antiepileptics. This study aimed to identify prescription patterns over time using electronic medical records and analyze their relationship with TDM practice. Data were collected from a clinical data warehouse from 2007 to 2020, and the number of patients, total number of drug administration days, serum level tests, and TDM were calculated. The ratio was calculated as the number of serum level tests or TDM to the total number of drug administration days. The study included 136,427 and 162,927 patients from SNUH and SNUBH who were prescribed 11 specified drugs. Each drug showed different prescription patterns over time, and the serum level test and TDM also changed with prescription pattern changes. Serum level test or TDM of antibiotics was frequently used compared to antiepileptics. As some drugs' usage and test for drugs have decreased newly developed drugs are replacing old drugs. It is recommended that TDM services include these new drugs as well for an effective and safe therapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available