4.7 Article

Au L-shell x-ray emission induced by 154.3-423.9 MeV/u C6+ ions

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-23830-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0402300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11505248, 11775042, 11875096, U1532263]
  3. Scientific research plan of science and Technology Department of Shaanxi Province [2021JQ-812]
  4. Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [20JK0975]
  5. Acadimic Leader of Xianyang Normal University, China [XSYXSD202108]
  6. Key Cultivation Project of Xianyang Normal University, China [XSYK21037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The L-shell x-ray emissions of gold under high energy C6+ ion bombardment exhibit blue shift and relative intensity enhancement due to multiple ionization effects. Comparisons between experimental and theoretical estimations show that BEA is more consistent with the experiment.
The L-shell x-ray emissions of gold are investigated for the bombardment of high energy C6+ ions in the high energy region of 154.3-423.9 MeV/u. Due to the multiple ionization of outer-shell electrons at the movement of L x-ray emission, the blue shift of the experimental x-ray energy and an enhancement of the relative intensity ratios of L iota, L beta-L alpha x rays are observed. Using the improved thin target formula and considering the effect of multiple ionization on atomic parameters, the L-subshell x-ray production cross sections are extracted from the counts and compared with the theoretical estimations of BEA, PWBA and ECPSSR. It is found that the relative corrections of ECPSSR on PWBA can be ignored in the present experimental energy region. The calculations of PWBA and ECPSSR are almost identical and both are larger than the experimental results. The BEA is in better agreement with the experiment as a whole.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available