4.6 Article

The renal cortical collecting duct: a secreting epithelium?

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 594, Issue 20, Pages 5991-6008

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1113/JP272877

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vitro microperfusion experiments have demonstrated that cortical collecting ducts (CCDs) reabsorb sodium via principal and type B intercalated cells under sodium-depleted conditions and thereby contribute to sodium and blood pressure homeostasis. However, these experiments were performed in the absence of the transepithelial ion concentration gradients that prevail in vivo and determine paracellular transport. The present study aimed to characterize Na+, K+ and Cl-fluxes in the mouse CCD in the presence of physiological transepithelial concentration gradients. For this purpose, we combined in vitro measurements of ion fluxes across microperfused CCDs of sodium-depleted mice with the predictions of a mathematical model. When NaCl transport was inhibited in all cells, CCDs secreted Na+ and reabsorbed K+; Cl-transport was negligible. Removing inhibitors of type A and B intercalated cells increased Na+ secretion in wild-type (WT) mice but not in H+/K+-ATPase type 2 (HKA2) knockout mice. Further inhibition of basolateral NaCl entry via the Na+-K+-2Cl-cotransporter in type A intercalated cells reduced Na+ secretion in WT mice to the levels observed in HKA2(-/-) mice. With no inhibitors, WT mouse CCDs still secreted Na+ and reabsorbed K+. In vivo, HKA2(-/-) mice excreted lessNa(+) thanWT mice after switching to a high-salt diet. Taken together, our results indicate that type A intercalated cells secrete Na+ via basolateral Na+-K+-2Cl-cotransporters in tandem with apical HKA2 pumps. They also suggest that the CCD can mediate overall Na+ secretion, and that its ability to reabsorb NaCl in vivo depends on the presence of acute regulatory factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available