4.7 Article

Interactive salinity and water stress severely reduced the growth, stress tolerance, and physiological responses of guava (Psidium Guajava L.)

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22602-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research found that high salinity and water shortage can inhibit the growth of guava, and guava cannot survive when the salinity reaches 40 dS m(-1). The dry weights of shoot and root decreased by over 70% under the treatment of 20 dS m(-1) + WS. Similarly, the guava showed the lowest stress tolerance under the treatment of 20 dS m(-1), followed by the treatment of 20 dS m(-1) + WS.
Salinity and water stress are serious environmental issues that reduced crop production worldwide. The current research was initiated (2012) in the wirehouse of the Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan to investigate the growth, stress tolerance, and physiological responses of guava to salinity and water shortage. Guava was grown for one year in pots containing soil with Eight treatments (control, 10 dS m(-1), 20 dS m(-1), 40 dS m(-1), control + water stress (WS), 10 dS m(-1) + WS, 20 dS m(-1) + WS, 40 dS m(-1) + WS) in a completely randomized design. The results indicated that plant growth, stress tolerance, and physiological parameters declined at higher salinity and water stress and could not survive at 40 dS m(-1). The 20 dS m(-1) + WS caused a > 70% decline in dry weights of shoot and root regarding control. Similarly, the highest decrease in stress tolerance was noticed in 20 dS m(-1) + WS followed by the 20 dS m(-1) treatment than control. Our findings validated that guava can be cultivated on soils having salinity <= 10 dS m(-1) but it could not be cultivated on soils having salinity >= 20 dS m(-1) with limited water supply.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available