4.7 Review

The Role of Partial Enteral Nutrition for Induction of Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review of Controlled Trials

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 14, Issue 24, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu14245263

Keywords

inflammatory bowel disease; Crohn's disease; nutritional therapy; enteral nutrition; diet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review analyzed the effectiveness of partial enteral nutrition (PEN) as a remission induction therapy in Crohn's disease (CD). The results suggest that PEN combined with a highly restrictive diet seems to be as effective as exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in inducing CD remission, but further studies are needed to confirm this finding.
Exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) is recommended as a first-line therapy to induce remission of Crohn's disease (CD) and is considered as effective as corticosteroid treatment. However, the dietary restriction causes lack of adherence and poor tolerance to the therapy. Partial enteral nutrition (PEN), which allows for the ingestion of some food, could be a better tolerated alternative, but it is unknown whether it is as effective at inducing CD remission as EEN. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the available evidence on PEN as a remission induction therapy in CD. A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE (via PUBMED) and Cochrane Library databases following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Clinical trials in pediatric and adult patients were included. The risk of bias was assessed following the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. The selected studies showed variable but high response rates to PEN and EEN. Limitations regarding the wide heterogeneity between the studies included in this review should be considered. Although more studies are needed, according to our results, PEN combined with a highly restrictive diet seems to be as effective as EEN in inducing remission of CD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available