4.7 Review

Protecting Low-Income Consumers in the Era of Digital Grocery Shopping: Implications for WIC Online Ordering

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15020390

Keywords

WIC; online ordering; laws; regulations; consumer protection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) will allow participants to redeem food benefits online, which may have implications for participants' welfare due to the potential information advantage of vendors. The online ordering environment for WIC may also impact vendors, ultimately affecting WIC participants. To protect participants' rights, policymakers need an appropriate legal and regulatory framework. This review highlights privacy, transparency, and fairness as guiding principles for WIC online ordering.
The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) is now expected to allow participants to redeem their food benefits online, i.e., via online ordering, rather than only in-store. However, it is unclear how this new benefit redemption model may impact participants' welfare since vendors may have an asymmetric information advantage compared with WIC customers. The WIC online ordering environment may also change the landscape for WIC vendors, which will eventually affect WIC participants. To protect WIC consumers' rights in the new online ordering model, policymakers need an appropriate legal and regulatory framework. This narrative review provides that framework by reviewing the literature, legal treatises, and reports on enforceable laws and regulations in the U.S. relevant to digital marketing. The results identify key issues that may arise with adopting WIC online ordering. This paper suggests privacy, transparency, and fairness as guiding principles to protect the welfare of WIC participants in WIC online ordering.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available