4.7 Article

Soy Food Consumption Is Inversely Associated with Handgrip Strength: Results from the TCLSIH Cohort Study

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15020391

Keywords

soy food; handgrip strength; diet; epidemiology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Habitual soy food consumption is associated with muscle strength decline among Chinese adults, suggesting that soy foods may have beneficial effects on muscle health.
Background: Soy foods contain high levels of soy protein or isoflavones, which can stimulate muscle protein synthesis and increase antioxidant capacity, and thus ameliorate muscle strength decline. However, data from epidemiological studies investigating the association of habitual soy food consumption with muscle strength decline among general Chinese adults are limited. Methods: This study included 29,525 participants (mean age: 41.6 years; 16,933 (53.8%) males). Soy food consumption was evaluated using a validated 100-item food frequency questionnaire. Handgrip strength (HGS) was assessed with a hand dynamometer. Analysis of covariance were performed to assess the multivariable-adjusted least square means (LSM) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for HGS. Results: The multiple adjusted LSM (95% CI) of HGS across soy food consumption were 35.5 (34.2, 37.1) kg for <1 time per week, 36.1 (34.6, 37.6) kg for 1 time per week, 36.3 (34.8, 37.8) kg for 2-3 times per week, and 36.6 (35.1, 38.0) kg for >= 4 times per week (p for trend < 0.001). Compared to participants with soy food consumption less than one time per week, the multiple adjusted odds ratio (95% CI) of low HGS was 0.638 (0.485, 0.836) when the weekly consumption was >= 4 times (p for trend < 0.01). Conclusions: Higher habitual soy food consumption was positively associated with HGS in general Chinese adults. Consumption of soy foods may have beneficial effects on muscle health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available