4.7 Article

Dietary Habits and Lifestyle, Including Cardiovascular Risk among Vegetarians and Omnivores during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Polish Population

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15020442

Keywords

COVID-19; lockdown; vegetarian diet; vegan diet; cardiovascular risk; diet quality; dietary habits; lifestyle; behavioral factors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined lifestyle changes, particularly dietary habits, of omnivores and vegetarians during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that vegetarians demonstrated more regular dietary habits during the pandemic.
Background: This study assessed how two food groups-omnivores (OMN) and vegetarians (VEGE)-differ in lifestyle changes, including dietary habits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials: A total of 861 persons participated in the survey and were divided into two groups: persons following a mixed diet (n = 489) and vegetarians, including vegans (n = 372). The mean age shows no significant differences. Methods: An online survey was conducted on the Polish population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data was collected using social media; the survey was intended for adults and included separate sheets for different diets (OMN vs. VEGE). Results: The results in both groups were similar regarding the burden of premature diseases. Most respondents (similar to 90%) did not indicate cardiovascular disease abnormalities. In the OMN group, overweight and obesity occurred more often, and the OMN group also showed a higher percentage of people reporting weight gain (OMN 42.7% vs. VEGE 35.9%). The results disclosed the VEGE group significantly more frequently chose products, i.e., vegetables (p = 0.029), legumes (p < 0.001), and dairy products or their plant substitutes (p = 0.002), compared to the OMN group. Conclusions: The VEGE group revealed the most regularities in dietary habits during the pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available