4.7 Article

Orthorexia Nervosa Practices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: The DORA Study

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu15030713

Keywords

diet; disordered eating; eating disorders; mental health; pain; obesity; remission; rheumatic disease; weight loss; DAS28

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to evaluate the tendencies of orthorexia nervosa (ON) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The results showed that most patients had ON tendencies, with a higher tendency in female patients and a lower tendency in older patients with higher body mass index. These findings highlight the importance of awareness and screening for ON in patients with RA.
Medical nutrition therapy (MNT) is an indisputable component of the multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Previous research has suggested that in chronic disease where nutrition is an important effector of prognosis, healthy dietary choices might take an unhealthy turn, with patients developing disordered eating in the form of orthorexia nervosa (ON). ON is characterized by a pathological preoccupation with healthy, pure eating, associated with restrictive dietary patterns, nutrient deficiencies and worsening disease outcomes. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to evaluate ON tendencies in a sample of adult patients with RA. A total of 133 patients with RA were recruited, and completed the ORTO-15 questionnaire for the assessment of ON tendencies. Most of the patients were overweight/obese (53.4%). The results revealed ON tendencies in the sample, with the median ORTO-15 score reaching 36 (IQR: 33-39). Greater ON tendencies were associated with the female gender, and lowered ON tendencies with increasing age and body mass index. The present findings highlight the need for health professional awareness regarding the problem of ON in patients with RA and the importance of screening patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available