4.6 Article

Mechanical Properties and Root Canal Shaping Ability of a Nickel-Titanium Rotary System for Minimally Invasive Endodontic Treatment: A Comparative In Vitro Study

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 15, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma15227929

Keywords

austenite; fatigue fractures; martensite; nickel-titanium; root canal preparation; torque

Funding

  1. Tokyo Medical and Dental University [11BA100267]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the mechanical properties and root canal shaping abilities of TruNatomy (TRN) with existing instruments. The results showed that TRN performed better in terms of load values, cycles to fracture, torque, and vertical force.
Selection of an appropriate nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary system is important for minimally invasive endodontic treatment, which aims to preserve as much root canal dentin as possible. This study aimed to evaluate selected mechanical properties and the root canal shaping ability of TruNatomy (TRN), a NiTi rotary system designed for minimally invasive endodontic shaping, in comparison with existing instruments: HyFlex EDM (HEDM), ProTaper Next (PTN), and WaveOne Gold (WOG). Load values measured with a cantilever bending test were ranked as TRN < HEDM < WOG < PTN (p < 0.05). A dynamic cyclic fatigue test revealed that the number of cycles to fracture was ranked as HEDM > WOG > TRN > PTN (p < 0.05). Torque and vertical force generated during instrumentation of J-shaped artificial resin canals were measured using an automated instrumentation device connected to a torque and vertical force measuring system; TRN exhibited smaller torque and vertical force values in most comparisons with the other instruments. The canal centering ratio for TRN was smaller than or comparable to that for the other instruments except for WOG at the apex level. Under the present experimental conditions, TRN showed higher flexibility and lower torque and vertical force values than the other instruments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available