4.6 Article

Effect of Al-5Ti-0.25C-0.25B and Al-5Ti-1B Master Alloys on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al-9.5Si-1.5Cu-0.8Mn-0.6Mg Alloy

Journal

MATERIALS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ma16031246

Keywords

Al-Si alloy; grain refinement; mechanical properties; master alloys; extrusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this research was to investigate the influence of Al-5Ti-0.25C-0.25B and Al-5Ti-1B master alloys on the mechanical properties and structural characteristics of Al-9.5Si-1.5Cu-0.8Mn-0.6Mg alloy. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was used to analyze the microstructure, while tensile testing was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties. The results demonstrated that the addition of 0.5% Al-5Ti-0.25C-0.25B and 0.5% Al-5Ti-1B master alloys significantly refined the alpha-Al dendrites and improved the ultimate tensile strength and elongation of the extruded alloy.
The goal of this research was to determine how the master alloys Al-5Ti-0.25C-0.25B and Al-5Ti-1B affected the mechanical properties and structural characteristics of the alloy Al-9.5Si-1.5Cu-0.8Mn-0.6Mg. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) was used to probe the microscopic composition, and the mechanical properties were evaluated using tensile testing. The results showed that, by adding 0.5% Al-5Ti-0.25C-0.25B master alloy and 0.5% Al-5Ti-1B master alloy, the alpha-Al dendrites can be significantly refined. In the extrusion state, the ultimate tensile strength and elongation with 0.5% Al-5Ti-0.25C-0.25B master alloy reached 380 MPa and 11.2%, which were 5.5% and 22.4% higher than no refinement, respectively. The elongation of the samples with the Al-5Ti-1B alloy addition increased from 9% to 11.9%, which is attributed to the fact that more pronounced complete recrystallization occurred during the extrusion heat treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available