4.0 Review

A comparison of antiplatelet therapy during the peri- and post-operative periods following flow-diverting stent insertion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review

Journal

INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/15910199221148551

Keywords

Intracranial aneurysms; antiplatelet; flow diverter; DAPT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background flow diverters (FDs) are used for managing unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is essential to prevent thromboembolic events during and after the procedure. However, there is limited consensus on the choice and dosing of antiplatelets for neuroendovascular treatment of aneurysms.
Background Flow diverters (FDs) are neuroendovascular stents indicated for the management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Due to their composition, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is essential during the peri- and post-operative periods to prevent thromboembolic events. However, there is limited consensus within the scientific community regarding which antiplatelets to use and dosing following neuroendovascular treatment of aneurysms. Method A systematic search of four electronic databases was conducted during November 2020 that included studies published between January 2010 and November 2020. Eligibility for inclusion included primary research articles, published in the English language and use of flow-diverting intracranial stents. Studies were excluded if they utilised combined therapies (e.g. FD with stent-assisted coiling), animal studies, clinical trial protocols and study population of less than 10 subjects. Results Eighteen studies were identified for inclusion with a total of 1312 patients with 1355 unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with FDs. Of these, 13 studies primarily investigated the use of clopidogrel with aspirin with low rates of haemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications. A forest plot of nine of these studies showed average efficacy of 88% at 95% confidence interval (CI) (SD + 5%) with 63% heterogeneity. Conclusions The large proportion of studies investigating clopidogrel and aspirin antiplatelet therapy presents a challenge in comparing antiplatelet regimens. Although prasugrel and ticagrelor have been identified as suitable alternatives to clopidogrel, these were based on studies with small cohort sizes. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors may be efficacious as rescue therapy for intra-procedural thrombosis. Further research is required to determine which antiplatelet is most suitable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available