4.5 Article

Prospects for beam-based study of dodecapole nonlinearities in the CERN High-Luminosity Large Hadron Collider

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS
Volume 137, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03367-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nonlinear magnetic errors in low-beta insertions can significantly impact the beam dynamics of colliders. Correction of such errors is crucial for improving operational benefits. This paper assesses the feasibility of beam-based observables for correcting dodecapole order errors in the experimental insertions of the HL-LHC, based on experience from the LHC's second operational run.
Nonlinear magnetic errors in low-beta insertions can have a significant impact on the beam-dynamics of a collider, such as the CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and its luminosity upgrade (HL-LHC). Indeed, correction of sextupole and octupole magnetic errors in LHC experimental insertions has yielded clear operational benefits in recent years. Numerous studies predict, however, that even correction of nonlinearitites up to dodecapole order will be required to ensure successful exploitation of the HL-LHC. It was envisaged during HL-LHC design that compensation of high-order errors would be based upon correction of specific resonances, as determined from magnetic measurements during construction. Experience at the LHC demonstrated that beam-based measurement and correction of the sextupole and octupole errors was an essential complement to this strategy. As such, significant interest also exists regarding the practicality of beam-based observables of multipoles up to dodecapole order. Based on experience during the LHC's second operational run, the viability of beam-based observables relevant to dodecapole order errors in the experimental insertions of the HL-LHC are assessed and discussed in detail in this paper.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available