4.5 Article

Life cycle carbon emission and cost-effectiveness analysis of electric vehicles in China

Journal

ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2022.11.008

Keywords

Life cycle assessment; Electric vehicles; Carbon emissions; Cost-effectiveness; Marginal abatement costs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electric vehicles play a crucial role in energy transition and low-carbon development. Evaluating their energy-saving emissions and cost-effectiveness is crucial. This paper establishes a life cycle carbon emission model and cost model, and combines them with emission inventory and calculated costs to establish a marginal emission reduction cost model. The results show that electric vehicles reduce 47% of life-cycle carbon emissions, mainly in the utilization phase; electric vehicles have lower emission and usage costs, but still cannot compensate for the higher initial purchase costs compared to gasoline vehicles; under current conditions, electric vehicles have higher marginal abatement costs affected by various factors, but with potential for decline; when gasoline prices exceed 9.8 CNY/L (1.372 USD/L), the abatement costs of electric vehicles become negative, making them an effective option for energy saving and emission reduction.
Electric vehicles play an important role in energy transition and low-carbon development. It is important to evaluate the energy-saving emission reduction and cost-effectiveness of electric vehicles. In this paper, the life cycle carbon emission model and the life cycle cost model are established. Combined with the emission inventory and the calculated life cycle cost, the marginal emission reduction cost model is finally established. The results show that: 1) Electric vehicles have reduced 47 % of life-cycle carbon emissions, which is mainly reflected in the extremely small emissions during the utilization phase, and with little difference in other phases; 2) Although electric vehicles have lower emission costs and vehicle use costs, they still cannot compensate the gap in initial purchase costs. Electric vehicles do not have economic advantages over gasoline vehicles; 3) Under the existing technical conditions, electric vehicles have higher marginal abatement costs. The abatement costs are affected by many factors and have a large potential for decline; 4) When the gasoline price exceeds 9.8 CNY/L (1.372 USD/ L), the abatement costs of electric vehicles are negative. In this condition, the development of electric vehicles is most effective in promoting energy saving and emission reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available