4.6 Article

Enhanced enzyme stability and gas utilization by microbubble aeration applying microporous aerators

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 1098-1110

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cy01761j

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the optimization of biocatalysis processes, it is important to overcome the limitations of mass transfer and enzyme stability. Aeration with microbubbles is advantageous due to its high gas utility, low-pressure drop, and reduced foam formation. This study compares the effects of microbubble, classic sub-millibubble, and macrobubble aeration on enzyme stability and gas utility.
During the optimization of processes in biocatalysis, the limitations of mass transfer and enzyme stability have to be overcome. To achieve these goals, aeration with microbubbles is advantageous by providing favorable properties, which include high gas utility, low-pressure drop, and reduced foam formation. In this study, the influences of microbubble, classic sub-millibubble and macrobubble aeration on enzyme stability and gas utility are compared. Using five enzymes, the half-life was investigated by comparing the microbubble aeration with a 2 mu m porous sintered frit to the macrobubble aeration with a 5 mm open pipe, both adjusted to provide a constant k(L)a of 160 h(-1). Furthermore, the half-life of a glucose oxidase was investigated by variation of the k(L)a in the range of 40 to 350 h(-1) and the mode of the aeration system comparing the 2 mu m and 10 mu m sintered frit as well as the 5 mm open pipe. In both experimental set-ups, it was demonstrated that the aeration with microbubbles using the 2 mu m sintered frit was beneficial for reaching high levels of enzyme stability. From this, we discovered that the interfacial area renewal rate plays an important role in the process of enzyme deactivation, which changes depending on the aeration mode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available