4.6 Article

Direct analysis at temporal and molecular level of deactivating coke species formed on zeolite catalysts with diverse pore topologies

Journal

CATALYSIS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages 1288-1300

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2cy01850k

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyze the evolution of coke species on Ni/ZSM-5, beta, and Y zeolites during ethylene oligomerization using high-resolution mass spectrometry. By directly analyzing the used catalysts and their soluble and insoluble coke fractions, we establish a correlation between reaction mechanisms, location of coke, and catalyst performance. Ab initio calculations are performed to understand the preferred location of coke. We investigate the peculiar deactivation mechanism of ZSM-5 zeolite (MFI structure) with two parallel deactivation pathways.
The mechanistic understanding of coke formation on zeolites is elusive, given the limitations for the extraction and analysis of coke species. Here, we analyze the evolution of deactivating coke species over time on the surface of Ni/ZSM-5, beta and Y zeolites during ethylene oligomerization, which is a representative coke-forming reaction. We present a method that directly analyzes the coke species using high-resolution mass spectrometry on the used catalysts and their isolated soluble and insoluble coke fractions (indirect analysis). Along with other techniques, we report a full-picture temporal evolution of coke and its fractions at the molecular level to establish a correlation between the dominant reaction mechanisms, the location of coke within the catalyst structure, and the observed performance of the catalysts. Ab initio calculations are performed to understand the preferable location of coke. We delve deep into the peculiar deactivation mechanism of ZSM-5 zeolite (MFI structure), which shows two less intuitive parallel deactivation pathways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available