4.8 Review

Air Instability of Ni-Rich Layered Oxides-A Roadblock to Large Scale Application

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.202202993

Keywords

air instability; cathode active materials; large-scale application; Ni-rich layered oxides; storage evolution behavior

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review comprehensively and critically explores the issue of air instability in Ni-rich layered oxides and reviews various modification strategies. The authors propose further research and provide perspectives for achieving practical applications of Ni-rich layered oxides.
Benefiting from the excellent lithium ions diffusion kinetics and considerable discharge specific capacity, Ni-rich layered oxides have become the preferred selection cathode active materials (CAMs) for high energy density Li-ion batteries. However, due to the distinctive electronic structure of nickel ions (Ni2+/3+/4+) and the strict criteria for sintering conditions, the Ni-rich CAMs inherently suffer from notorious deterioration when in contact with the ambient air. This review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of air instability for Ni-rich CAMs, a neglected but critical issue for large-scale application. The fundamental understanding of derivation of air instability and characterizations is first given, followed by a discussion of evolution behaviors and the corresponding negative influence on fabricating properties of electrodes and electrochemical/safety performance of batteries. Afterward, various material modification strategies for improving air storage stability including pre-treatment by doping and coating and post-treatment by gas, wash, and heat are overviewed. Finally, some perspectives for further exploration to address the air instability issue and pave ways toward Ni-rich CAMs' practical applications are also proposed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available