4.8 Article

Kinetics of mRNA nuclear export regulate innate immune response gene expression

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34635-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. [U01HG007912]
  2. [R01AI127864]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates mRNA export rates for innate immune genes and finds that the export rate is gene-specific. Additionally, the export rate does not determine temporal gene responsiveness but complements mRNA decay rates to ensure similar abundances of short- and long-lived mRNAs.
The abundance and stimulus-responsiveness of mature mRNA is thought to be determined by nuclear synthesis, processing, and cytoplasmic decay. However, the rate and efficiency of moving mRNA to the cytoplasm almost certainly contributes, but has rarely been measured. Here, we investigated mRNA export rates for innate immune genes. We generated high spatio-temporal resolution RNA-seq data from endotoxin-stimulated macrophages and parameterized a mathematical model to infer kinetic parameters with confidence intervals. We find that the effective chromatin-to-cytoplasm export rate is gene-specific, varying 100-fold: for some genes, less than 5% of synthesized transcripts arrive in the cytoplasm as mature mRNAs, while others show high export efficiency. Interestingly, effective export rates do not determine temporal gene responsiveness, but complement the wide range of mRNA decay rates; this ensures similar abundances of short- and long-lived mRNAs, which form successive innate immune response expression waves. The UCLA Ribonomics group reports that the nuclear export efficiency of innate immune mRNAs varies over a hundred-fold range such that for many genes only a small fraction of the newly synthesized premRNA reaches the cytoplasm. They show that nuclear export and cytoplasmic decay rates are correlated thereby ensuring similar expression levels of short-lived and long-lived mRNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available