Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior
Gregory Eady et al.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2023)
Outside Lobbying over the Airwaves: A Randomized Field Experiment on Televised Issue Ads
Joshua L. Kalla et al.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2022)
Assembling the Networks and Audiences of Disinformation: How Successful Russian IRA Twitter Accounts Built Their Followings, 2015-2017
Yini Zhang et al.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION (2021)
Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017
Christopher A. Bail et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2020)
Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
Andrew M. Guess et al.
NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)
Array programming with NumPy
Charles R. Harris et al.
NATURE (2020)
Campaigns influence election outcomes less than you think
David W. Nickerson et al.
SCIENCE (2020)
The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments
Alexander Coppock et al.
SCIENCE ADVANCES (2020)
Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three US Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017
Josephine Lukito
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION (2020)
Cross-Platform State Propaganda: Russian Trolls on Twitter and YouTube during the 2016 US Presidential Election
Yevgeniy Golovchenko et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS (2020)
Troll Factories: Manufacturing Specialized Disinformation on Twitter
Darren L. Linvill et al.
POLITICAL COMMUNICATION (2020)
Various Versatile Variances: An Object-Oriented Implementation of Clustered Covariances in R
Achim Zeileis et al.
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2020)
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election
Nir Grinberg et al.
SCIENCE (2019)
Protecting elections from social media manipulation
Sinan Aral et al.
SCIENCE (2019)
An Equivalence Approach to Balance and Placebo Tests
Erin Hartman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2018)
The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments
Joshua L. Kalla et al.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2018)
Examining a Most Likely Case for Strong Campaign Effects: Hitler's Speeches and the Rise of the Nazi Party, 1927-1933
Peter Selb et al.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2018)
FROM LIBERATION TO TURMOIL: SOCIAL MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY
Joshua A. Tucker et al.
JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY (2017)
Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses
Daniel Lakens
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)
Dates and Times Made Easy withlubridate
Garrett Grolemund et al.
Journal of Statistical Software (2015)
Arguing for a Negligible Effect
Carlisle Rainey
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2014)
Do Online Advertisements Increase Political Candidates' Name Recognition or Favorability? Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments
David E. Broockman et al.
POLITICAL BEHAVIOR (2014)