☆ 4.8 Article

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2023)

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior

Gregory Eady et al.

Summary: This study uses longitudinal survey data and Twitter data of US respondents to quantify the relationship between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and attitudes and voting behavior in the 2016 US election. The results show that exposure to Russian disinformation accounts was primarily concentrated among strongly identified Republican users, with only 1% of users accounting for 70% of exposures. Furthermore, the influence of the Russian campaign was overshadowed by content from domestic news media and politicians. Importantly, no meaningful relationship was found between exposure to the Russian foreign influence campaign and changes in attitudes, polarization, or voting behavior.

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS (2023)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

Outside Lobbying over the Airwaves: A Randomized Field Experiment on Televised Issue Ads

Joshua L. Kalla et al.

Summary: This field experiment demonstrated that issue ads can influence public opinion, but not all ads are persuasive, and the persuasive effects decay over time. Despite the significant investment in television ads, this study sheds light on the mechanisms and limitations of televised persuasion and interest group influence.

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2022)

Add to Collection

Article Communication

Assembling the Networks and Audiences of Disinformation: How Successful Russian IRA Twitter Accounts Built Their Followings, 2015-2017

Yini Zhang et al.

Summary: This study investigates how successful Russian Internet Research Agency (IRA) Twitter accounts constructed followings for their disinformation campaigns around the 2016 U.S. presidential election. The results show that partisan enclaves and media amplification played key roles in boosting IRA accounts' followers, illustrating how network dynamics within social media and news media together contributed to the growth of social media followings. The findings also underscore the dynamics fueling the spread of disinformation, including partisan polarization, media fragmentation and asymmetry, and an attention economy focused on engagement rather than accuracy.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION (2021)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017

Christopher A. Bail et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Psychology, Biological

Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election

Andrew M. Guess et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2020)

Add to Collection

Review Multidisciplinary Sciences

Array programming with NumPy

Charles R. Harris et al.

NATURE (2020)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Campaigns influence election outcomes less than you think

David W. Nickerson et al.

SCIENCE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

The small effects of political advertising are small regardless of context, message, sender, or receiver: Evidence from 59 real-time randomized experiments

Alexander Coppock et al.

SCIENCE ADVANCES (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Communication

Coordinating a Multi-Platform Disinformation Campaign: Internet Research Agency Activity on Three US Social Media Platforms, 2015 to 2017

Josephine Lukito

POLITICAL COMMUNICATION (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Communication

Cross-Platform State Propaganda: Russian Trolls on Twitter and YouTube during the 2016 US Presidential Election

Yevgeniy Golovchenko et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESS-POLITICS (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Communication

Troll Factories: Manufacturing Specialized Disinformation on Twitter

Darren L. Linvill et al.

POLITICAL COMMUNICATION (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Various Versatile Variances: An Object-Oriented Implementation of Clustered Covariances in R

Achim Zeileis et al.

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE (2020)

Add to Collection

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election

Nir Grinberg et al.

SCIENCE (2019)

Add to Collection

Editorial Material Multidisciplinary Sciences

Protecting elections from social media manipulation

Sinan Aral et al.

SCIENCE (2019)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

An Equivalence Approach to Balance and Placebo Tests

Erin Hartman et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments

Joshua L. Kalla et al.

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

Examining a Most Likely Case for Strong Campaign Effects: Hitler's Speeches and the Rise of the Nazi Party, 1927-1933

Peter Selb et al.

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2018)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

FROM LIBERATION TO TURMOIL: SOCIAL MEDIA AND DEMOCRACY

Joshua A. Tucker et al.

JOURNAL OF DEMOCRACY (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Psychology, Social

Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for t Tests, Correlations, and Meta-Analyses

Daniel Lakens

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)

Add to Collection

Article Statistics & Probability

Dates and Times Made Easy withlubridate

Garrett Grolemund et al.

Journal of Statistical Software (2015)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

Arguing for a Negligible Effect

Carlisle Rainey

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE (2014)

Add to Collection

Article Political Science

Do Online Advertisements Increase Political Candidates' Name Recognition or Favorability? Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments

David E. Broockman et al.

POLITICAL BEHAVIOR (2014)

Add to Collection

© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.