4.8 Article

Structures of the eukaryotic ribosome and its translational states in situ

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34997-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. Zuckerberg Initiative for Visual Proteomics Imaging
  3. EMBO Fellowship [ALTF 33-2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used in situ structural biology techniques to investigate the translational states of eukaryotic ribosomes. By employing cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging and classification, the researchers obtained the in situ structure of ribosomes within cells, as well as the distribution of translational states and unique arrangement of rRNA expansion segments.
Ribosomes translate genetic information into primary structure. During translation, various cofactors transiently bind to the ribosome that undergoes prominent conformational and structural changes. Different translational states of ribosomes have been well characterized in vitro. However, to which extent the known translational states are representative of the native situation inside cells has thus far only been addressed in prokaryotes. Here, we apply cryo-electron tomography to cryo-FIB milled Dictyostelium discoideum cells combined with subtomogram averaging and classification. We obtain an in situ structure that is locally resolved up to 3 Angstrom, the distribution of eukaryotic ribosome translational states, and unique arrangement of rRNA expansion segments. Our work demonstrates the use of in situ structural biology techniques for identifying distinct ribosome states within the cellular environment. The translational states of eukaryotic ribosomes have so far been only investigated in vitro. Here, authors obtained the 3.8 angstrom in situ 80S ribosome structure, the distribution of translational states and unique arrangement of rRNA expansion segments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available