4.6 Article

A mixed-methods study of the effectiveness and perceptions of a course design institute for health science educators

Journal

BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03910-w

Keywords

Course design; Faculty development; Health sciences; Higher education; Mixed methods

Funding

  1. A.T. Still University Small Grant Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the impact of a faculty development program on course design and pedagogy skills amongst health educators. The results suggest that the program significantly improved participants' knowledge of instructional alignment, learning goals, instructional strategies, assessment planning, and adult learning theories. Participants were satisfied with the experience and recognized the value of the program in their own development. They also believed that the program should be mandatory for all educators at the institution.
Background: Most health care professionals get their start in academics without formal teaching training. As such, institutions encourage participation in opportunities to address gaps in faculty's knowledge of pedagogy and learning theory in order to promote both successful student and patient outcomes. This study aimed to examine the reception of a faculty development program focused on teaching participants the basics of course design.Methods: Applying a mixed-method approach, this retrospective study used pre/post-tests, assignment grades, self-assessment questionnaires, and focus groups to elucidate the impact of the faculty development intervention on course design. The participants (n = 12) were health educators from a private all-graduate level university with campus locations across the United States, including in the Southwest and Midwest. In the Course Design Institute (CDI), the participating faculty learned evidence-based instructional approaches and techniques to implement contemporary teaching practices.Results: The data from the pre/post-tests and focus groups suggest that participants learned about topics including instructional alignment, learning goals and objectives, instructional strategies, assessment planning, feedback approaches, communicating expectations, and adult learning theories by participating in this course. The final deliverable scores indicate that the CDI graduates were able to apply a backward design process to plan their own instruction. Data from both the survey and the focus groups suggest that participants were satisfied with the experience and particularly appreciated that the course was relevant to them as educators in the health sciences.Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the CDI was influential in developing the faculty's knowledge of the course design process, promoted the application of course design and pedagogy skills amongst CDI graduates, and positively impacted self-reported attitudes about their teaching abilities. In addition, feedback from participants indicates that they recognized the value of this program in their own development and they believed it should be a required course for all educators at the institution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available