4.6 Article

Stress wave emission from plasmonic nanobubbles

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/50/1/015304

Keywords

nanobubbles; stress wave; cavitation; gold nanoparticles; biological effects

Funding

  1. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS-UEFISCDI [PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0079]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress wave emission from the collapse of cavitation nanobubbles, generated after irradiation of single-spherical gold nanoparticles with laser pulses, was investigated numerically. The significant parameters of this study are the nanoparticle radius, laser pulse duration, and laser fluence. For conditions comparable to those existing during plasmonic photothermal therapy, a purely compressive pressure wave is emitted during nanobubble collapse, not a shock. In the initial stage of its propagation, the stress wave amplitude is proportional to the inverse of the stress wave radius. The maximum amplitude and the duration of the stress wave decreases with the laser fluence, laser pulse duration, and gold nanoparticle radius. The full width at half maximum duration of the stress wave is almost constant up to a distance of 50 mu m from the emission center. The stress wave amplitude is smaller than 5 MPa, while the stress wave duration is smaller than 35 ns. The stress wave propagation results in minor mechanical effects on biological tissue that are restricted to very small dimensions on a cellular or sub-cellular level. The stress wave is, however, able to produce breaching of the human cell membrane and bacterial wall even at distances as large as 50 mu m from the emission centre. The experimentally observed melting of gold nanoparticles comes from the large temperature reached inside the nanoparticles during laser irradiation and not from the propagation of the stress wave into the surrounding liquid during nanobubble rebound.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available