4.2 Article

Exact Basilar Artery Occlusion Location Indicates Stroke Etiology and Recanalization Success in Patients Eligible for Endovascular Stroke Treatment

Journal

CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 483-490

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00062-022-01236-0

Keywords

Stroke; Basilar artery occlusion; Stroke causes; Mechanical thrombectomy; Recanalization success; Clinical outcome prediction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to determine the impact of the exact location of basilar artery occlusion (BAO) on stroke etiology, recanalization success, and favorable clinical outcomes in patients receiving endovascular stroke treatment (EST). The results showed that the occlusion site correlated with stroke etiology and recanalization success, but did not predict favorable clinical outcomes.
Introduction Endovascular stroke treatment (EST) is commonly performed for acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO). We aimed to identify the role of the exact location of BAO in patients receiving EST regarding the stroke etiology, recanalization success and prediction of favorable clinical outcome.Methods Retrospective analysis of 191 consecutive patients treated for BAO with EST from 01/2013 until 06/2021 in a tertiary stroke center. Groups were defined according to exact location of BAO in I: proximal third, II: middle third, III: distal third and IV: tip of the basilar artery. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for BAO location comparing stroke etiology, recanalization result and favorable clinical outcome according to mRS 0-3 90 days after stroke onset.Results Occlusion sides types I-IV were evenly distributed (37, 36, 60 and 58 patients). Types I and II were more often associated with large artery atherosclerosis (50 vs. 10 patients, p < 0.001). Distal/tip occlusion (types III/IV) occurred mostly in cardiac embolism or embolic stroke of unknown source (89 vs. 12 in types I/II, p < 0.001). Occlusion site correlated with the underlying stroke etiology (AUC [Area under the curve] 0.89, p < 0.0001, OR [odds ratio] for embolism in type IV: 245). Recanalization rates were higher in patients with distal occlusions (type III/IV OR 3.76, CI [95% confidence interval] 1.51-9.53, p = 0.0076). The BAO site is not predicting favorable clinical outcome.Conclusion The exact basilar artery occlusion site in patients eligible for endovascular stroke treatment reflects the stroke etiology and is associated with differing recanalization success but does not predict favorable clinical outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available