4.6 Article

Acceptable walking and cycling distances and functional disability and mortality in older Japanese adults: An 8-year follow-up study

Journal

HEALTH & PLACE
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102952

Keywords

Physical activity; Walkability; Bikeability; Active travel; Mobility limitation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a prospective study to investigate the relationship between acceptable travel distances (walking and cycling) and the incidence of functional disability and mortality among older Japanese adults. A baseline survey was conducted in 2013 among 7618 individuals aged >= 65 years in Kasama City, Japan, with follow-up until 2021. Shorter acceptable walking and cycling distances were found to be significantly associated with higher risks of functional disability and mortality, according to a multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model. In conclusion, acceptable distances of <500 m for walking and <1 km for cycling were associated with increased risks of functional disability and mortality among older adults.
We prospectively investigated the association between acceptable travel distances (i.e., walking and cycling) and the incidence of functional disability and mortality among older Japanese adults. A baseline survey was con-ducted in 2013 among 7618 individuals aged >= 65 years in Kasama City, Japan, and they were tracked through the city's database until 2021. Acceptable travel distances were assessed using a questionnaire. Outcomes (i.e., functional disability and mortality) were gathered as binary (incident or not) with survival time. A multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model indicated that shorter acceptable walking and cycling distances were markedly linked with higher risks of functional disability and mortality. In conclusion, acceptable distances of <500 m for walking and <1 km for cycling were associated with higher risks of functional disability and mortality among older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available