4.5 Article

HER2-positive invasive lobular carcinoma: a rare breast cancer which may not necessarily require anti-HER2 therapy. A population-based study

Journal

BREAST CANCER
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages 343-353

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-022-01432-3

Keywords

Breast cancer; HER2-positive lobular carcinoma; Anti-HER2 therapy; Registry; Survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analysed the data from a registry database in France to compare outcomes of patients with HER2+ invasive lobular cancer (ILC), HER2+ invasive ductal cancer (IDC), and HER2- ILC. The results showed that the survival rates of HER2+ ILC were similar to HER2+ IDC and did not differ significantly from HER2- ILC.
BackgroundHER2-positive (HER2 +) invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is rare and poorly characterised. In particular, patient outcomes compared to those associated with HER2 + invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and HER2-negative (HER2 -) ILC, as well as the benefits of anti-HER2 therapy, are not well established.MethodsWe analysed the data from the Cote d'Or Registry of Breast and Gynaecological Cancers (France) for all patients diagnosed with early-stage HER2 + ILC (62 cases), HER2 + IDC (833 cases) and HER2 - ILC (685 cases) between 1998 and 2015 to compare overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) between these groups in correlation with anti-HER2 therapy.ResultsILCs were associated with older age, larger tumours, lower histological grades, higher hormonal receptor positivity rates and multifocality, and more common endocrine therapy. OS and DFS between the three groups did not differ. We found that anti-HER2 therapy was associated with a survival benefit in patients with HER2 + IDC. In contrast, the survival of HER2 + ILC patients was not improved by anti-HER2 treatment, remaining close to that of HER2 - ILC patients.ConclusionHER2 + ILC seems not to be associated with better outcomes than HER2 + IDC but may not differ from HER2 - ILC in terms of survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available