4.6 Review

Scratching the Surface Takes a Toll: Immune Recognition of Viral Proteins by Surface Toll-like Receptors

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15010052

Keywords

Toll-like receptors; TLR agonist; TLR antagonist; TLR2; TLR4; viruses; viral proteins; innate immunity; cytokines; interferons

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early recognition of viruses by the host's innate immune system is crucial for a rapid response and clearance of infection. Surface Toll-like receptors (TLRs) can be activated by viruses before host cell infection, but this activation can have either beneficial or detrimental effects on viral clearance and pathogenesis. Research has identified specific viral proteins that bind to surface TLRs and affect the host immune response and infection outcome, but controversy remains regarding this recognition process.
Early innate viral recognition by the host is critical for the rapid response and subsequent clearance of an infection. Innate immune cells patrol sites of infection to detect and respond to invading microorganisms including viruses. Surface Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a group of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that can be activated by viruses even before the host cell becomes infected. However, the early activation of surface TLRs by viruses can lead to viral clearance by the host or promote pathogenesis. Thus, a plethora of research has attempted to identify specific viral ligands that bind to surface TLRs and mediate progression of viral infection. Herein, we will discuss the past two decades of research that have identified specific viral proteins recognized by cell surface-associated TLRs, how these viral proteins and host surface TLR interactions affect the host inflammatory response and outcome of infection, and address why controversy remains regarding host surface TLR recognition of viral proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available