4.6 Article

IFITMs from Naturally Infected Animal Species Exhibit Distinct Restriction Capacities against Toscana and Rift Valley Fever Viruses

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v15020306

Keywords

Toscana virus; Rift Valley fever virus; IFITM; viral restriction

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rift Valley Fever virus (RVFV) and Toscana virus (TOSV) are pathogenic arthropod-borne viruses that pose a growing threat to public and veterinary health. This study found that TOSV is highly sensitive to inhibition by IFITMs from different animal species, while RVFV is inhibited by human IFITM-2 and IFITM-3, but not IFITM-1, and shows varying levels of resistance to bovine and camel IFITMs. These findings provide insights into the interplay between zoonotic viruses and IFITMs.
Rift Valley Fever virus (RVFV) and Toscana virus (TOSV) are two pathogenic arthropod-borne viruses responsible for zoonotic infections in both humans and animals; as such, they represent a growing threat to public and veterinary health. Interferon-induced transmembrane (IFITM) proteins are broad inhibitors of a large panel of viruses belonging to various families and genera. However, little is known on the interplay between RVFV, TOSV, and the IFITM proteins derived from their naturally infected host species. In this study, we investigated the ability of human, bovine, and camel IFITMs to restrict RVFV and TOSV infection. Our results indicated that TOSV was extremely sensitive to inhibition by all the animal IFITMs tested, while RVFV was inhibited by human IFITM-2 and IFITM-3, but not IFITM-1, and exhibited a more heterogeneous resistance phenotype towards the individual bovine and camel IFITMs tested. Overall, our findings shed some light on the complex and differential interplay between two zoonotic viruses and IFITMs from their naturally infected animal species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available