4.3 Article

A dictionary of abbreviations used in reptile descriptions

Journal

ZOOTAXA
Volume 5219, Issue 5, Pages 421-432

Publisher

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5219.5.2

Keywords

morphology; species description; diagnosis; standardization

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Species are typically described using morphological terms, but there is currently no standardization for these terms and their abbreviations. Standardization is necessary for future machine-readability of all species descriptions in biology.
Species are usually described by morphological terms. In order to simplify and shorten descriptions these are often abbreviated (e.g., SVL for snout-vent-length). However, there has been no systematic attempt to define and standardize such terms or their abbreviations. Here we present an initial list of 594 unique abbreviations from a total list of 1,223 abbreviations collected from >50 reptile species descriptions, resulting in a non-redundant list of 344 abbreviations. Most of these abbreviations describe either meristic characters such as scale counts (46%) or measurements such as SVL (snout -vent-length) (30%). The remainder describe presence/absence states, colors, or formulas such as ratios. We highlight the common problem of synonyms and homonyms, i.e., different terms and abbreviations for the same character or the same term for different characters. We propose to standardize definitions of terms and abbreviations in future species descriptions. In order to future-proof species descriptions for machine-readability such as text-mining, standardization is needed for all species descriptions in biology, not just reptiles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available