4.6 Article

Linear woodcutting of European beech: experiments and computations

Journal

WOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 1, Pages 51-74

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00226-022-01442-6

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hardwood species are becoming increasingly important as a sustainable building material due to global temperature changes and conifer pests. This article focuses on the disintegration process of European beech and uses experimental and finite element methods to model the process. The computationally predicted results show good agreement with the experiments, indicating that the model can be used for further investigations.
Hardwood species are becoming increasingly important with the growing need for a diversity of forests that have recently been facing global temperature changes or conifer pests. This further leads to the growth of its potential as a building material that may originate from sustainable production. As hardwoods need to be properly processed, the article deals with the disintegration of European beech. The influence of wood grain direction, uncut chip thickness and cutting speed on the cutting force magnitudes was experimentally investigated using the device with a rotating arm of approximately 4 m in diameter. Then, the disintegration process was modelled using the finite element method in Abaqus/Explicit. The developed material model consisting of orthotropic elasticity and plasticity with rate-independent and rate-dependent tensile-compressive failure asymmetry was implemented through the user subroutine, while the crack initiation and propagation were realized using the element deletion technique. The computationally predicted average values of cutting forces and chip shapes were, except for a few tests, in good agreement with the experiments. It means that the model may be used for further investigation, such as the influence of tool wear.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available