4.2 Review

Sickness Symptoms in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Scoping Review

Journal

WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 344-362

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/01939459221128125

Keywords

kidney transplantation; depression; anxiety; fatigue; sickness behavior; scoping review

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sickness symptoms, such as depressive symptoms, anxiety, and fatigue, are common among people with chronic illness, including KT recipients. While these symptoms are interrelated, they do not form a distinct cluster. Fatigue, anxiety, and depressive symptoms are the most prevalent among KT recipients. Various factors, including demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, can predict these symptoms.
Sickness symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and fatigue) are common among people with chronic illness, often presenting as a symptom cluster. Sickness symptoms persist in many patients with chronic kidney disease, even after kidney transplantation (KT); however, little is known about sickness symptom-induced burden in KT recipients. This scoping review synthesizes available evidence for sickness symptoms in KT recipients, including findings on symptom prevalence, predictors, outcomes, interrelationships, and clustering. Among 38 reviewed studies, none identified sickness symptoms as a cluster, but we observed interrelationships among the symptoms examined. Fatigue was the most prevalent sickness symptom, followed by anxiety and depressive symptoms. Predictors of these symptoms included demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors, and health-related quality of life was the most researched outcome. Future research should use common data elements to phenotype sickness symptoms, include biological markers, and employ sophisticated statistical methods to identify potential clustering of sickness symptoms in KT recipients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available