4.7 Article

A357 aluminium alloy produced by LPBF: Tribological behaviour in dry sliding conditions

Journal

WEAR
Volume 510-511, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2022.204488

Keywords

Sliding wear; Non-ferrous metals; Other manufacturing process; Electron microscopy; Surface topography; Wear testing

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry for the Economic Development (MISE) [CUP: I34I19005780001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to evaluate the tribological behavior of LPBF-produced aluminum alloy A357 and compare it with conventionally manufactured A357. The results show that LPBF under optimized conditions reduces the wear rate and maintains a comparable coefficient of friction compared to conventional methods.
Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) is increasingly used in packaging, automotive and aerospace sectors for manufacturing Al alloy components where fatigue and wear damage can readily occur. Therefore, this work aims to assess the tribological behaviour of A357 alloy (AlSi7Mg0.6) produced by LPBF as a function of both printing parameters and heat treatment conditions, applying a novel T6 based on rapid solution followed by artificial aging, which improves the strength-ductility balance. Dry sliding tests (block-on-ring) were performed using A357 samples as stationary blocks against rotating quenched and tempered AISI 52100 (100Cr6) steel. LPBF samples were compared with A357 obtained by sand casting, subjected to Hot Isostatic Pressing (HIP) and conventional T6 heat treatment. Microstructural refinement induced by LPBF carried out in optimised condi-tions, even without post-processing treatments, reduced the wear rate in comparison to conventional sand-cast, HIP-ed and T6 heat-treated A357, while maintaining comparable coefficient of friction. The rapid solution T6 did not worsen the tribological behaviour of as-built LPBF A357 components, even though it induced a slight hardness decrease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available