Irrigation by Crop in the Continental United States From 2008 to 2020

Agriculture is the largest user of water in the United States. Yet, we do not understand the spatially resolved sources of irrigation water use (IWU) by crop. The goal of this study is to estimate crop-specific IWU from surface water withdrawals (SWW), total groundwater withdrawals (GWW), and nonrenewable groundwater depletion (GWD). To do this, we employ the PCR-GLOBWB 2 global hydrology model to partition irrigation information from the U.S. Geological Survey Water Use Database to specific crops across the Continental United States (CONUS). We incorporate high-resolution input data on agricultural production and climate within the CONUS to obtain crop-specific irrigation estimates for SWW, GWW, and GWD for 20 crops and crop groups from 2008 to 2020 at county spatial resolution. Over the study period, SWW decreased by 20%, while both GWW and GWD increased by 3%. On average, animal feed (alfalfa/hay) uses the most irrigation water across all water sources: 33 from SWW, 13 from GWW, and 10 km(3)/yr from GWD. Produce used less SWW (43%), but more GWW (57%), and GWD (27%) over the study time-period. The largest changes in IWU for each water source between the years 2008 and 2020 are: rice (SWW decreased by 71%), sugar beets (GWW increased by 232%), and rapeseed (GWD increased by 405%). These results present the first national-scale assessment of irrigation by crop, water source, and year. In total, we contribute nearly 2.5 million data points to the literature (3,142 counties; 13 years; 3 water sources; and 20 crops).

Automated summary

This study aims to estimate the irrigation water use (IWU) of different crops in the United States. By utilizing the PCR-GLOBWB 2 global hydrology model and incorporating data on agricultural production and climate, the study provides crop-specific estimates of irrigation water use for surface water withdrawals (SWW), total groundwater withdrawals (GWW), and nonrenewable groundwater depletion (GWD) from 2008 to 2020 at county spatial resolution. The results indicate that surface water withdrawals decreased by 20% over the study period, while both groundwater withdrawals and nonrenewable groundwater depletion increased by 3%.