Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Memory precision for salient distractors decreases with learned suppression
Bo-Yeong Won et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2022)
Systemic effects of selection history on learned ignoring
Andy Kim et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2022)
The past, present, and future of selection history
Brian A. Anderson et al.
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS (2021)
Testing temporal integration of feature probability distributions using role-reversal effects in visual search
Omer Daglar Tanrikulu et al.
VISION RESEARCH (2021)
History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors
Kirsten C. S. Adam et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE (2021)
Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias
Haena Kim et al.
COGNITION (2021)
Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search
Bo-Yeong Won et al.
CORTEX (2020)
Statistical regularities bias overt attention
Benchi Wan et al.
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS (2019)
Anticipatory Distractor Suppression Elicited by Statistical Regularities in Visual Search
Benchi Wang et al.
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE (2019)
How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression
Benchi Wang et al.
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS (2018)
Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy
Benchi Wang et al.
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS (2018)
Rapid learning of visual ensembles
Andrey Chetverikov et al.
JOURNAL OF VISION (2017)
Building ensemble representations: How the shape of preceding distractor distributions affects visual search
Andrey Chetverikov et al.
COGNITION (2016)
Hes1 promotes additional cell cycles when used to replace Math5
S. Wang et al.
JOURNAL OF VISION (2013)
Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention
Yuhong V. Jiang et al.
COGNITION (2013)
Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy
Edward Awh et al.
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2012)
Experience-dependent attentional tuning of distractor rejection
Daniel B. Vatterott et al.
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (2012)
Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model
Brian A. Anderson et al.
ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS (2010)
Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection
Jan Theeuwes
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA (2010)
Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses
Chiara Della Libera et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2009)
Integration of exogenous input into a dynamic salience map revealed by perturbing attention
Puiu F. Balan et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE (2006)
The neural basis of object perception
K Grill-Spector
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY (2003)
Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention
JW Bisley et al.
SCIENCE (2003)
Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1
JA Mazer et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2002)
Shape representation in area V4: Position-specific tuning for boundary conformation
A Pasupathy et al.
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2001)