4.4 Article

Expansion of viral genomes with viral protein genome linked copies

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 577, Issue -, Pages 174-184

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2022.10.012

Keywords

VPg; Virus; Bioinformatics; Evolution; Gene duplications; Dicistrovirus

Categories

Funding

  1. CIHR [PJT-178342]
  2. NSERC Discovery grant [RGPIN- 2017-04515]
  3. NSERC PGS D scholarship
  4. Life Sciences Institute Core (Bioinformatics)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a novel bioinformatics approach to identify VPg sequences in viral genomes and found 717 dicistrovirus genomes containing VPgs. VPg duplications were also identified in aquamavirus and mosavirus genomes. The results indicate that VPg duplications are more widespread than anticipated and suggest co-evolution between VPgs and viral genomes.
Virus protein-linked genome (VPg) proteins are required for replication. VPgs are duplicated in a subset of RNA viruses however their roles are not fully understood and the extent of viral genomes containing VPg copies has not been investigated in detail. Here, we generated a novel bioinformatics approach to identify VPg sequences in viral genomes using hidden Markov models (HMM) based on alignments of dicistrovirus VPg sequences. From metagenomic datasets of dicistrovirus genomes, we identified 717 dicistrovirus genomes containing VPgs ranging from a single copy to 8 tandem copies. The VPgs are classified into nine distinct types based on their sequence and length. The VPg types but not VPg numbers per viral genome followed specific virus clades, thus suggesting VPgs co-evolved with viral genomes. We also identified VPg duplications in aquamavirus and mosavirus genomes. This study greatly expands the number of viral genomes that contain VPg copies and in-dicates that duplicated viral sequences are more widespread than anticipated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available