4.6 Article

Quantitative x-ray diffraction analysis of bimodal damage distributions in Tm implanted Al0.15Ga0.85N

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 49, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/49/13/135308

Keywords

AlGaN; defects; implantation; x-ray diffraction; strain; ion channelling

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/78740/2011, SFRH/BPD/111285/2015, SFRH/BPD/98738/2013, PTDC/FIS-NAN/0973/2012, PTDC/CTM-NAN/2156/2012]
  2. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/CTM-NAN/2156/2012, PTDC/FIS-NAN/0973/2012, SFRH/BD/78740/2011] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work radial symmetric x-ray diffraction scans of Al0.15Ga0.85N thin films implanted with Tm ions were measured to determine the lattice deformation and crystal quality as functions of depth. The alloys were implanted with 300 keV Tm with 10 degrees off-set to the sample normal to avoid channelling, with fluences varying between 10(13) Tm cm(-2) and 5 x 10(15) Tm cm(-2). Simulations of the radial 2 theta-omega scans were performed under the frame of the dynamical theory of x-ray diffraction assuming Gaussian distributions of the lattice strain induced by implantation defects. The structure factor of the individual layers is multiplied by a static Debye-Waller factor in order to take into account the effect of lattice disorder due to implantation. For higher fluences two asymmetric Gaussians are required to describe well the experimental diffractograms, although a single asymmetric Gaussian profile for the deformation is found in the sample implanted with 1013 Tm cm(-2). After thermal treatment at 1200 degrees C, the crystal quality partially recovers as seen in a reduction of the amplitude of the deformation maximum as well as the total thickness of the deformed layer. Furthermore, no evidence of changes with respect to the virgin crystal mosaicity is found after implantation and annealing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available